Skip to main content
  • Short Report
  • Open access
  • Published:

Draft genome sequence of fastidious pathogen Ceratobasidium theobromae, which causes vascular-streak dieback in Theobroma cacao

Abstract

Background

Ceratobasidium theobromae, a member of the Ceratobasidiaceae family, is the causal agent of vascular-streak dieback (VSD) of cacao, a major threat to the chocolate industry in the South-East Asia. The fastidious pathogen is very hard to isolate and maintain in pure culture, which is a major bottleneck in the study of its genetic diversity and genome.

Result

This study describes for the first time, a 33.90 Mbp de novo assembled genome of a putative C. theobromae isolate from cacao. Ab initio gene prediction identified 9264 protein-coding genes, of which 800 are unique to C. theobromae when compared to Rhizoctonia spp., a closely related group. Transcriptome analysis using RNA isolated from 4 independent VSD symptomatic cacao stems identified 3550 transcriptionally active genes when compared to the assembled C. theobromae genome while transcripts for only 4 C. theobromae genes were detected in 2 asymptomatic stems. De novo assembly of the non-cacao associated reads from the VSD symptomatic stems uniformly produced genes with high identity to predicted genes in the C. theobromae genome as compared to Rhizoctonia spp. or genes found in Genbank. Further analysis of the predicted C. theobromae transcriptome was carried out identifying CAZy gene classes, KEGG-pathway associated genes, and 138 putative effector proteins.

Conclusion

These findings put forth, for the first time, a predicted genome for the fastidious basidiomycete C. theobromae causing VSD on cacao providing a model for testing and comparison in the future. The C. theobromae genome predicts a pathogenesis model involving secreted effector proteins to suppress plant defense mechanisms and plant cell wall degrading enzymes.

Background

Ceratobasidium theobromae (P.H.B. Talbot & Keane) Samuels & Keane (syn. Oncobasidium theobromae, Thanatephorus theobromae) is a basidiomycete fungus that causes Vascular-streak dieback (VSD), the second most important disease of Theobroma cacao (cacao) in Southeast Asia after Phytophthora pod rot (black pod) [1]. While the global loss due to black pod is around 400,000 tons annually, VSD is responsible for approximately 30,000 tons of cacao crop loss, similar to losses due to frosty pod, another disease restricted to South and Central America [1]. Established as the causal pathogen during the 1960s [2], cacao and avocado are the only known hosts of this new encounter disease [3]. The short-lived, wind-borne spores of C. theobromae infect the soft young leaves at the branch tip and colonize the leaf xylem. From the leaf, the hyphae reach the stem through the petiole and spread via the xylem vessels and cause vascular necrosis and dieback of the branches, sometimes killing young trees (Fig. 1). The pathogen is endemic to most cacao growing areas of Melanesia and Southeast Asia, causes severe losses locally and contributes to declining productivity and farmers abandoning cacao cultivation. Due to the limited availability of morphological and genetic diversity information and its fastidious nature, C. theobromae has been very difficult to study. Currently the pathogen is identified based on PCR/sequencing of ITS regions [1]. In a recent report, Oberwinkler et al. [4] suggested that the number of nuclei in the hyphal cells was inadequate as a taxonomically defining character and hence, C. theobromae should be renamed Rhizoctonia theobromae. Within the Ceratobasidiaceae family, Rhizoctonia spp. are the most widely studied due to their wide host range and global distribution. Though there are at least 5 publicly available genomes of multinucleate R. solani isolates with various anastomosis groups (AG1-IA, AG1-IB, AG2-2IIIB, AG3 and AG8) [5,6,7,8,9], there are no similar studies on binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. (teleomorphs: Ceratobasidium spp.).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Vascular streak dieback (VSD) symptoms on cacao trees. a Branches killed due to VSD on mature cacao trees. b The visible streaks in the xylem of young stems of cacao trees. c, d Infection of transverse sections of cacao stems

The xylem-infecting pathogen grows from infected tissue onto water agar or Corticium Culture Medium (CCM) [10], but cannot be maintained in pure culture [11]. Due to its slow growth, other fungi present in the stems, petioles or leaves often overgrow C. theobromae during isolation attempts. When isolated in an apparent pure culture, the fungus dies out with repeated attempts at subculturing. The absence of pure culture biomass is the major constraint in obtaining good quality DNA required for molecular studies of C. theobromae. After multiple prolonged attempts, we obtained putative mycelia of C. theobromae and have carried out whole genome sequencing of the fungus for the first time. C. theobromae being fastidious in nature, we used the transcriptome sequence of symptomatic and asymptomatic cacao tissue to confirm the causal agent of VSD and identify its transcriptionally active genes.

Result and discussion

VSD, caused by the fastidious basidiomycete C. theobromae, is a serious threat to the cacao industry in South East Asia [1]. To isolate the VSD causing pathogen, we collected stems and petioles showing symptoms of VSD from the Soppeng District of South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. One isolate (CT2) from these tissues was suspected to be C. theobromae based on its mycelial morphology [11] on water agar, and transferred to CCM media. After 3 months of growth, mycelia were harvested and DNA extracted and subjected to ITS sequencing. BLASTn searches of the ITS sequence showed 99.85% similarity to a C. theobromae strain South Sulawesi 2 (GenBank: HQ424246). Strains of multinucleate R. solani have been assigned to 13 anastomosis groups (AG-1 to AG-13). Whereas, strains of binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. with Ceratobasidium teleomorphs have been grouped into 21 anastomosis groups designated as AG-A to AG-U [12]. Publicly available ITS sequences were obtained from GenBank for different Rhizoctonia spp. and Ceratobasidium spp. representing 30 of the anastomosis groups mentioned above. A phylogenetic study involving the ITS sequence of the C. theobromae isolate CT2 along with isolate previously reported from Indonesia and the 30 anastomosis groups shows that C. theobromae forms a separate clade and the closest related anastomosis groups are AG-A and AG-K (Fig. 2). Similar results were also reported by Samuels et al. [11] who also confirmed the binucleate nuclear condition of C. theobromae mycelia and observed hyphal anastomoses. Using a nested PCR assay, 7 VSD symptomatic cacao stem samples from the Luwu District of South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia were confirmed to be infected by C. theobromae, and alignment of the ITS sequences from the 7 samples showed no variation (result not shown). There was one base pair difference between the ITS sequences of CT2 and the set of samples from Luwu (result not shown), indicating possible regional variation among the C. theobromae strains. Among the confirmed C. theobromae infected VSD symptomatic stem samples, 4 were subjected to RNA-Seq analysis along with 2 asymptomatic control samples.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Ceratobasidium theobromae isolated from vascular streak dieback (VSD) symptomatic cacao samples from Soppeng (CT) and in planta strains, present in the VSD symptomatic cacao samples from Luwu District of South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia (INS), a C. theobromae isolate previously reported from Indonesia [11] and different Rhizoctonia spp. and Ceratobasidium spp. representing 30 anastomosis groups. The distance tree of 1000 bootstrapped data sets with the highest log likelihood (− 924.178) is shown. Branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site

The initial genome assembly obtained was 44,646,720 bp and consisted of 105,861 contigs with a N50 length of 36,882 bp. Though the average GC content of the assembly was 49.25%, many of the smaller contigs had GC content greater than 60%, indicating the presence of bacterial DNA in the assembly, though the mycelial culture in liquid CCM appeared clean. Although the bacterial contamination may have been random, another possibility is that the bacterial contaminant may have synergistic effects on the growth of C. theobromae possibly being necessary for its growth in vitro and/or contributing to the pathogens fastidious nature. A recent report on the presence of a bacterial endosymbionts in R. solani AG 2-2IIIB and its role in virulence [13], makes it relevant to resolve the presence of the bacterial genome along with C. theobromae. To remove the bacterial contamination from the genome assembly we combined two post-assembly cleaning approaches. A metagenome binning approach was used to filter out the fungal and bacterial genome. The second approach was based on GC-content and multiple similarity searches to detect potential contaminating sequences in the initial assembly. These post-assembly cleaning procedures have some advantages over pre-assembly cleanup [14].

Engaging MetaBAT2, an automated metagenome binning software tool to reconstruct single genomes [15], 105,861 contigs were grouped into 4 genome bins (Table 1). Bin 1 included 28.29 Mbp, with an average GC content of 49.33% and the closest representation was R. solani. Bin 2 and 3 were also represented as R. solani and the total sequence included was small (Table 1). Altogether, 613 contigs from the three bins correspond to 29.15 Mbp of sequence information and was considered as putative C. theobromae genome sequence. The fourth bin included 2.33 Mbp, with an average GC content of 72.25% and the closest representation was Actinomyces sp. The bacterial genome showed 83.5% BUSCO [16] completeness (Table 1). Further studies are needed to see if the same bacterium is always associated with C. theobromae and has any role in its virulence or fastidious nature. MetaBAT2 was unable to bin 104,801 contigs, which were manually processed based on GC-content and multiple similarity searches. For that, we first eliminated 96,369 smaller contigs (< 200 bp), comprising 7.6 Mbp sequence information as possible bacterial contamination or bad sequence (Fig. 3a). The remaining contigs were subjected to BLASTn searches against the NCBI nucleotide (nt) database (version December, 2018) and a closely related R. solani genome (GenBank: JATN00000000) with an e-value cutoff of 1e−5. In total, 1371 contigs corresponding to 822.5 Kbp of sequence information were identified as bacterial in origin based on BLASTn hits to bacterial genes or genomes. A BLASTn search against the Rhizoctonia spp. identified 2078 contigs corresponding to 2.25 Mbp of sequence information and were considered as additional putative C. theobromae genome sequence. Another 4983 contigs (corresponding to 2.49 Mbp) could not be attributed to either bacteria or Rhizoctonia spp. (Fig. 3a). As a benefit of the doubt, we considered those to be part of the C. theobromae genome. Comparison of GC content and contig length of the predicted bacterial and C. theobromae contigs show clear difference (Fig. 3b, c). Using BBMap version 37.58 [17], 333,747,598 short reads (92.65% of the initial reads) were aligned to the 7674 contigs considered to be of C. theobromae genome. These reads were re-assembled using SPAdes and resulted in a 33.90 Mbp genome sequence with approximately 930× coverage.

Table 1 Clustering of the initial 105,861 genome assembly contigs (44.64 Mbp) into genome bins using MetaBAT2
Fig. 3
figure 3

Detection of bacterial contaminant in the initial genome assembly of Ceratobasidium theobromae. a The percentage of smaller contigs (< 200 bp), contigs sorted by MetaBAT2 and bacterial/Rhizoctonia blast hits over the contigs. b, c Illustrate the different distribution of GC contents in the sequences considered as bacterial and putative C. theobromae

The estimated C. theobromae genome is smaller than closely related Ceratobasidiales like R. solani strains (56.02–36.9 Mbp) [5,6,7,8,9] and Botryobasidium botryosum (45.75 Mb) [18]. The assembly consisted of 6878 contigs with N50 length of 70,517 bp (Table 2). The overall GC content of the C. theobromae genome is 44.81%, which is close to different strains of R. solani (43.8–48.4%) [5,6,7,8,9], the only other sequenced species in the Ceratobasidiaceae family. Among the assembled contigs, Contigs 1191 and 8134 were identified to be part of the mtDNA and carry the ITS and 28S ribosomal RNA gene sequence of C. theobromae. The ITS sequence acquired was identical to that obtained by PCR from the DNA submitted for sequencing and the 28S ribosomal RNA sequence was identical to that submitted by Samuels et al. [11] for C. theobromae. For quantitative assessment of genome completeness, BUSCO [16] analysis was conducted that indicated C. theobromae contains 99.1% of examined loci (85.3% complete genes and 13.3% fragmented genes). The ab initio gene prediction generated 9264 protein-coding genes in the C. theobromae genome with an average sequence length of 2,168 bp (Table 2). In comparison to the five strains of R. solani, the assembled CT2 genome has between 1225 to 4156 less genes.

Table 2 Genome assembly and annotation statistics of Ceratobasidium theobromae

Functional annotation of the 9264 predicted genes showed that 5364 (58%) could be assigned GO terms and 3055 (33%) could be mapped to the KEGG pathway database (Table 2; Additional file 1: Sheet 1). KEGG pathway analysis of the whole C. theobromae genome and two publicly available R. solani genomes (AG1-IA: AFRT00000000 and AG3: JATN00000000) showed very similar results, with nearly complete major metabolic pathways for both the species (Additional file 1: Sheet 3). This is another indication that, though the predicted C. theobromae genome is smaller with fewer genes compared to R. solani, its gene complement is almost complete. Bidirectional BLASTp analysis conducted with Rhizoctonia spp. has identified 800 species-specific genes for C. theobromae (Additional file 1: Sheet 2). Though the major part of these species-specific genes encodes hypothetical proteins, the most relevant difference was the 11 C. theobromae specific putative effector proteins (Additional file 1: Sheet 2).

C. theobromae being fastidious in nature, Koch’s postulates are not possible; therefore, we adopted the concept of sequence-based identification of the microbial pathogen [19] and relied on the transcriptome sequence of symptomatic and asymptomatic cacao tissue. RNA-Seq analysis of four VSD stem segments verified to carry the C. theobromae ITS sequence identified 3551 transcriptionally active genes (with ≥ 10 raw reads) from the C. theobromae transcriptome, compared to just four C. theobromae genes showing any read detection in the two asymptomatic samples (Additional file 1: Sheet 1). The relatively low level detection of C. theobromae transcripts in the VSD symptomatic tissue may be due to the low titer of the fungal RNA in the samples. This is consistent with earlier reports that the fungal load of C. theobromae in the symptomatic tissues is very low and the same PCR-based detection techniques used here often fail in VSD symptomatic cacao tissues [11].

Self-assembly of non-cacao RNA-Seq reads from the 4 VSD symptomatic tissue samples incorporated reads ranging from 88,978 to 746,046 (Additional file 2: Sheet 1–4), depending on the sample, representing less than 0.2% of the total reads of those samples. The number of de novo assembled transcripts from the four samples ranged from 425 to 2271 (Additional file 2: Sheet 1–4). When compared to sequences in Genbank, most of the de novo assembled transcripts showed homology to the related R. solani AG3. Almost every transcript showed higher homology to the C. theobromae genes predicted from the genome assembled in this study compared to R. solani AG3 genes (Additional file 2). A closer inspection of the alignments between the self-assembled transcripts and the predicted genes indicates that the self-assembled transcripts are much shorter and have gaps compared to predicted genes, but otherwise have near perfect sequence matches (result not shown). This further strengthens our assertion that we have sequenced the genome of the fungus causing VSD in cacao and that the predicted genes from the assembled genome are nearly complete.

After aligning the C. theobromae specific RNA-Seq reads (Table 3) from the 4 VSD symptomatic tissue samples against its genes assembled in this study, variant calling generated 4326 putative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and small insertions and deletions (INDELs). After filtering the variants (SNPs and INDELs) as mentioned in the methods, a total of 2278 putative CDS (coding DNA sequence)-based variants were obtained in 1051 C. theobromae genes (Additional file 2: Sheet 5). Among the 4 libraries, the total number of putative variants (QUAL ≥ 999, DP ≥ 30 and GQ ≥ 40) ranged between 307 and 1673 (Table 3). The ratios between heterozygous and homozygous variants ranged between 0.021 and 0.063 (Table 3). Though the sampling size is small and these variants are not validated yet, the presence of very low heterozygosity suggests local genetic variability among C. theobromae isolates from the South Sulawesi Province of Indonesia may be limited compared to regional variability. Moreover, there was not a single homozygous and heterozygous variant combinations for the same allele in the data set (Additional file 2: Sheet 5) suggesting, at a minimum, the pathogen is homothallic. Although sexual reproduction is known to occur in C. theobromae [11], we failed to identify mating type genes within the C. theobromae genome.

Table 3 List of filtered transcriptome sequence variants in RNA-Seq libraries from VSD-infected stems

Proteins secreted by plant pathogenic fungi have the potential to interact with and alter host cells and therefore, their identification and characterization is essential to understanding virulence and the mechanism of infection [20]. As predicted by SignalP version 5.1 [21], 998 proteins were considered potential components of the C. theobromae secretome (Additional file 1: Sheet 1), accounting for 10.7% of its proteome. Fungal effectors among the secretome were identified using the machine learning program EffectorP 2.0 [22]. The 138 effector proteins predicted (Additional file 1: Sheet 4) are considered of importance due to their potential to suppress the pathogen-associated molecular pattern triggered plant immunity and are potential candidate genes for future studies on virulence, symptom expression and host range. Although most of these effector proteins have homologs in the R. solani genomes, most were identified as hypothetical proteins. The predicted secreted proteins and effectors in five R. solani strains range between 391–1142 and 68–126 respectively [7].

To understand the potential C. theobromae genes involved in the modification and degradation of cell wall and other organic matter, the predicted genes were analyzed by BLASTp against the Carbohydrate-Active enzymes database (CAZymes) using a threshold value of E < 10−10 and > 40% sequence identity. A total of 119 CAZymes families mapping to 664 predicted C. theobromae proteins were identified (Table 4). The web server based automated CAZyme annotation using dbCAN2 [23] also generated similar result and identified 663 C. theobromae proteins as potential CAZymes. Among the potential CAZymes, 355 are predicted to encode secreted proteins based on the presence of a signal peptide (Table 4; Additional file 1: Sheet 1). Glycoside hydrolases (GH) formed the largest group followed by glycosyltransferases (GT) and auxiliary activities (AA) (Table 4). Among the secreted CAZymes, again the largest group is GH followed by AA and polysaccharide lyases (PL). Amongst these large families, PL1, 3, GH28, GH43 and CE8 are often involved in pectin degradation, a component of the plant primary cell wall and middle lamella [24]. Other enzymes (AA9, GH5, GH3, and GH16 for example) often target cellulose and hemicellulose [25]. Together, the genes encoding secreted CAZymes targeting pectin, cellulose, hemicellulose and xylan during infection are expected to support the infection and colonization of cacao by C. theobromae (Additional file 1: Sheet 1). In addition to secreted effectors and plant cell degrading enzymes, fungi have a broader arsenal of secreted proteins/enzymes at their disposal when causing disease. Among the non-CAZyme and non-effector secreted protein coding genes, proteases/peptidases are the largest group with known putative functions, followed by lipases and Cytochrome P450 genes (Additional file 1: Sheet 1). However unidentified hypothetical proteins remain the largest group and require more detailed study.

Table 4 Number of CAZymes family genes of Ceratobasidium theobromae

Conclusions

The assembled C. theobromae genome and its analysis provide insight into the genetic makeup of this important cacao pathogen. C. theobromae has the tools within its relatively compact 33.89 Mbp genome, like other plant pathogens, to cause plant disease. The C. theobromae genome presented supports a typical pathogenesis model, where the fungus secrets effector proteins involved in plant defense suppression along with enzymes required for degradation of cell walls and other cell components. Why the pathogen should be fastidious is unclear and whether its association with Actinomyces sp. has anything to do with the virulence or fastidious nature, requires more study. Although, a preliminary variant study suggests limited regional variation, future exploitation of the assembled genome should provide the basis for a better understanding of the genetic variability of the pathogen and support the development of potential disease resistance sources. The effector proteins identified here-in offer potential targets for molecular manipulation and resistance development. Due to the high number of genes that encode hypothetical proteins in this genome and limited detection of C. theobromae transcripts in planta, more research is needed to fully understand the disease mechanism of this fungus.

Materials and methods

Isolation and DNA extraction

VSD symptomatic cacao petioles were collected from Soppeng District of South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Petioles were surface sterilized by submerging in 6% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for three minutes followed by three rinses in sterile water. Segments were cut transversely exposing the xylem tissue and placed on water agar. Slow growing mycelium was transferred to liquid CCM [10] then transferred to fresh liquid CCM a second time. After a total of 3 months in liquid CCM at 25 °C, mycelia were harvested in 1.5 ml microtubes and collected by centrifugation (14,000 rpm for 15 min). The mycelial pellet was freeze dried and shipped to USDA-APHIS-PPQ facility in Beltsville, USA and transferred to the USDA-ARS Sustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory in Beltsville after inspection. DNA was extracted from the mycelia as described by Ali et al. [26].

Isolation of RNA from symptomatic plant material

VSD symptomatic and asymptomatic cacao stems were collected from the Luwu District of South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia and cut into 10 cm segments. Samples were freeze dried and shipped as mentioned above. Freeze dried cacao stems were ground in a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen and RNA was extracted as described by Bailey et al. [27].

Molecular identification of C. theobromae

For species confirmation of the mycelial DNA samples, PCR amplification of the ITS region of the template DNA of 5 C. theobromae samples, all originating from the same initial water agar culture, were performed using the ITS4 and ITS5 primers described by White et al. [28]. PCR amplification, product purification and sequencing was performed as previously described by Ali et al. [26]. Similarly, to confirm the presence and absence of C. theobromae in the symptomatic and asymptomatic cacao stems, cDNA was synthesized from the extracted RNA as described by Bailey et al. [27] and diluted cDNA (1:20) was subjected to nested PCR assays, first using fungal specific ITS 4 and 5 primers [28] followed by C. theobromae specific primers Than_ITS1 and 2 [11]. PCR products were sequenced as mentioned above.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of C. theobromae isolates and different Rhizoctonia spp. representing 30 anastomosis groups [29] was carried out based on DNA sequence data of ITS 1 and 2 regions. Sequences were aligned using the ClustalW2 tool [30] under default settings. A phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Poisson correction model [31] in MEGA6 [32].

Genome sequencing, assembly and binning

Ceratobasidium theobromae isolate CT2 genomic DNA was sequenced using Illumina paired-end short-read technology (library preparation and sequencing done by Beijing Genome Institute, Shenzhen, China). For the initial assembly, 360,198,964 short reads (100 bp) were trimmed using BBMap version 37.58 [17] and were assembled using SPAdes Genome Assembler version 3.11.0 [33] in read error correction and assembling mood. K-mers was set at K21, K33, K55. Genome bins were recovered based on tetranucleotide frequencies and read coverage using MetaBAT2 [15] with default parameters.

Ab initio gene prediction

The ab initio gene prediction was performed from the assembly results using AUGUSTUS version 2.7 [34] trained with R. solani AG3 gene models (GenBank: JATN00000000). The predicted proteins were compared against NCBI non-redundant (NR) protein databases by BLASTp to identify biological functions [35]. Open reading frames were also annotated using Blast2GO (http://www.blast2go.com/b2ghome) [36] and the KEGG–database of metabolic pathways [37].

Transcriptome sequencing

To validate the expression of the C. theobromae predicted genes, RNA-Seq was performed on RNA from 4 independent field collected VSD symptomatic cacao stems (validated as carrying C. theobromae above). Two asymptomatic samples were also included. RNA-Seq library preparation and paired-end sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeqX platform by Beijing Genome Institute, Shenzhen, China. RNA reads from RNA-Seq libraries ranging from 72 to 104 million reads in fastq format were trimmed up using BBDuk version 37.58 [17], using adapters.fa with parameters ktrrim = r, k = 23, mink = 11, hist = 1, tpe, tbo. Trimmed reads were aligned using HISAT2 2.1.0 [38] to the CDS of the C. theobromae genome assembled in this study.

Mining of putative variants

RNA-Seq reads in fastq format from each VSD symptomatic library (INS_19, INS_23, INS_31 and INS_57) were aligned to the CDS of the C. theobromae genome assembled in this study using a memory-efficient short-read aligner Bowtie-0.12.7 [39] and the variant calling and quality control was performed as previously described by Ali et al. [40]. In short, the files were outputted into SAM and converted to BAM format using SAMtools [41]. Variant calling was performed using SAMtools mpileup and bcftools with default parameters. The resulting VCF file was filtered manually using Excel functions. All variants (SNPs and INDELs) with QUAL < 999 and DP < 30 were removed and further filtered based on genotype quality (GQ) and retained if there was at least one library supporting it (GQ ≥ 40) (Additional file 2: Sheet 5).

De novo transcriptome assembly

To further validate the assembled genome of C. theobromae, the causal agent of VSD, we conducted independent de novo transcriptome assemblies of the non-cacao reads from the 4-field collected VSD symptomatic cacao stems as validated above. Trimmed reads for each sample were initially aligned using HISAT2 2.1.0 [38] to the CDS of the cacao genome [42], and the unaligned reads were assembled using SPAdes Genome Assembler version 3.11.0 [33] with K-mers set at K23. The ab initio gene prediction was performed from the assemblies using AUGUSTUS version 2.7 [34] trained with R. solani AG3 gene models. The predicted transcriptomes were compared against C. theobromae genome assembled in this study and closely related R. solani genome (GenBank: JATN00000000) by BLASTn and against NCBI non-redundant (NR) protein databases by BLASTx analysis.

Availability of data and materials

The complete nucleotide sequence assemblies and the Whole Genome Assembly of the C. theobromae isolate CT2 has been deposited at GenBank under the Accession SSOP00000000, under BioProject PRJNA524910. The combined transcriptome assembly from multiple tissues have been uploaded as additional files.

Abbreviations

AA:

auxiliary activities

AG:

anastomosis group

BLAST:

basic local alignment search tool

bp:

base pair

BUSCO:

benchmarking universal single-copy orthologs

CAZyme:

carbohydrate-active enzyme

CCM:

corticium culture medium

CDS:

coding DNA sequence

CE:

carbohydrate esterase

DP:

raw read depth

GC:

guanine–cytosine

GH:

glycoside hydrolases

GO:

gene ontology

GQ:

genotype quality

GT:

glycosyltransferases

INDEL:

small insertions and deletions

ITS:

internal transcribed spacer

Kbp:

kilobase pair

KEGG:

kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

Mbp:

megabase pair

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

PL:

polysaccharide lyases

RNA-Seq:

ribonucleic acid sequencing

SNP:

single nucleotide polymorphism

VSD:

vascular-streak dieback

References

  1. McMahon P, Purwantara A. Vascular streak dieback (Ceratobasidium theobromae): history and biology. In: Bailey BA, Meinhardt LW, editors. Cacao diseases: a history of old enemies and new encounters. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 307–35.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Keane P, Flentje N, Lamb K. Investigation of vascular-streak dieback of cocoa in Papua New Guinea. Aust J Biol Sci. 1972;25:553–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson RD. Avocado, an alternate host for Oncobasidium theobromae. Australas Plant Pathol. 1989;18:96–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oberwinkler F, Riess K, Bauer R, Kirschner R, Garnica S. Taxonomic re-evaluation of the Ceratobasidium-Rhizoctonia complex and Rhizoctonia butinii, a new species attacking spruce. Mycol Prog. 2013;12:763–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cubeta MA, Thomas E, Dean RA, Jabaji S, Neate SM, Tavantzis S, Toda T, Vilgalys R, Bharathan N, Fedorova-Abrams N. Draft genome sequence of the plant-pathogenic soil fungus Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 3 strain Rhs1AP. Genome Announc. 2014;2:e01072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hane JK, Anderson JP, Williams AH, Sperschneider J, Singh KB. Genome sequencing and comparative genomics of the broad host-range pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG8. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wibberg D, Andersson L, Tzelepis G, Rupp O, Blom J, Jelonek L, Pühler A, Fogelqvist J, Varrelmann M, Schlüter A. Genome analysis of the sugar beet pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2IIIB revealed high numbers in secreted proteins and cell wall degrading enzymes. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wibberg D, Rupp O, Jelonek L, Kröber M, Verwaaijen B, Blom J, Winkler A, Goesmann A, Grosch R, Pühler A. Improved genome sequence of the phytopathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IB 7/3/14 as established by deep mate-pair sequencing on the MiSeq (Illumina) system. J Biotechnol. 2015;203:19–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng A, Lin R, Zhang D, Qin P, Xu L, Ai P, Ding L, Wang Y, Chen Y, Liu Y. The evolution and pathogenic mechanisms of the rice sheath blight pathogen. Nat Commu. 2013;4:1424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotila JE. Study of the biology of a new spore-forming Rhizoctonia, Corticium praticola. Phytopathology. 1929;19:1059–99.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Samuels GJ, Ismaiel A, Rosmana A, Junaid M, Guest D, Mcmahon P, Keane P, Purwantara A, Lambert S, Rodriguez-Carres M. Vascular streak dieback of cacao in Southeast Asia and Melanesia: in planta detection of the pathogen and a new taxonomy. Fungal Biol. 2012;116:11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang G, Li C. General description of Rhizoctonia species complex. In: Cumagun CJ, editor. Plant pathology. Croatia: Intech Europe; 2012. p. 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Obasa K, White FF, Fellers J, Kennelly M, Liu S, Katz B, Tomich J, Moore D, Shinogle H, Kelley K. A dimorphic and virulence-enhancing endosymbiont bacterium discovered in Rhizoctonia solani. Phytobiomes. 2017;1:14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dittami SM, Corre E. Detection of bacterial contaminants and hybrid sequences in the genome of the kelp Saccharina japonica using Taxoblast. PeerJ. 2017;5:e4073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang D, Li F, Kirton ES, Thomas A, Egan RS, An H, Wang Z. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. Peer J Prepr. 2019;7:e27522v1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bushnell B. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. Berkeley: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riley R, Salamov AA, Brown DW, Nagy LG, Floudas D, Held BW, Levasseur A, Lombard V, Morin E, Otillar R. Extensive sampling of basidiomycete genomes demonstrates inadequacy of the white-rot/brown-rot paradigm for wood decay fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:9923–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fredericks D, Relman DA. Sequence-based identification of microbial pathogens: a reconsideration of Koch’s postulates. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rep M. Small proteins of plant-pathogenic fungi secreted during host colonization. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;253:19–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nature Methods. 2011;8:785–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sperschneider J, Dodds PN, Gardiner DM, Singh KB, Taylor JM. Improved prediction of fungal effector proteins from secretomes with EffectorP 2.0. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:2094–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P, Yang Z, Busk PK, Xu Y, Yin Y. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W95–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Benoit I, Coutinho PM, Schols HA, Gerlach JP, Henrissat B, de Vries RP. Degradation of different pectins by fungi: correlations and contrasts between the pectinolytic enzyme sets identified in genomes and the growth on pectins of different origin. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Morales-Cruz A, Amrine KC, Blanco-Ulate B, Lawrence DP, Travadon R, Rolshausen PE, Baumgartner K, Cantu D. Distinctive expansion of gene families associated with plant cell wall degradation, secondary metabolism, and nutrient uptake in the genomes of grapevine trunk pathogens. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ali SS, Amoako-Attah I, Bailey RA, Strem MD, Schmidt M, Akrofi AY, Surujdeo-Maharaj S, Kolawole OO, Begoude BAD, ten Hoopen GM, et al. PCR-based identification of cacao black pod causal agents and identification of biological factors possibly contributing to Phytophthora megakarya’s field dominance in West Africa. Plant Pathol. 2016;65:1095–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bailey BA, Crozier J, Sicher RC, Strem MD, Melnick R, Carazzolle MF, Costa GG, Pereira GA, Zhang D, Maximova S. Dynamic changes in pod and fungal physiology associated with the shift from biotrophy to necrotrophy during the infection of Theobroma cacao by Moniliophthora roreri. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2013;81:84–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.; 1990. p. 315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sharon M, Sneh B, Kuninaga S, Hyakumachi M, Naito S. Classification of Rhizoctonia spp. using rDNA-ITS sequence analysis supports the genetic basis of the classical anastomosis grouping. Mycoscience. 2008;49:93–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown N, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ, editors. Evolving genes and proteins. New York: Academic Press; 1965. p. 97–166.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stanke M, Steinkamp R, Waack S, Morgenstern B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W309–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W182–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:1650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ali SS, Shao J, Strem MD, Phillips-Mora W, Zhang D, Meinhardt LW, Bailey BA. Combination of RNAseq and SNP nanofluidic array reveals the center of genetic diversity of cacao pathogen Moniliophthora roreri in the upper Magdalena Valley of Colombia and its clonality. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Argout X, Fouet O, Wincker P, Gramacho K, Legavre T, Sabau X, Risterucci AM, Da Silva C, Cascardo J, Allegre M. Towards the understanding of the cocoa transcriptome: Production and analysis of an exhaustive dataset of ESTs of Theobroma cacao L. generated from various tissues and under various conditions. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the cacao farmers of Indonesia for providing accesses to their farms for sample collection. We also thank all the field and research staffs of Indonesian Coffee and Cocoa Research Institute and Hasanuddin University, for their help in collecting processing the samples. References to a company and/or product by the USDA are only for the purposes of information and do not imply approval or recomendation of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Funding

This work was funded by USDA ARS. Collection of isolates was supported by funding from the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research and an Australia Award Scholarship to MJ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the research: SSA, AA, APF, PM and BAB. Sample collection: AA, APF, AWS, AR, TYK and MJ. Performed the research: SSA, APF and AA. Bioinformatics and data analysis: SSA and JS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BAB PM, DG and LWM. Wrote the paper: SSA and BAB. Provided intellectual and editorial comments: SSA, BAB, PM, LWM and DG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan A. Bailey.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors have read the manuscript and gave consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

C. theobromae genome and predicted genes.

Additional file 2.

C. theobromae de novo transcriptome assemblies and variants.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, S.S., Asman, A., Shao, J. et al. Draft genome sequence of fastidious pathogen Ceratobasidium theobromae, which causes vascular-streak dieback in Theobroma cacao. Fungal Biol Biotechnol 6, 14 (2019). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40694-019-0077-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40694-019-0077-6

Keywords